|  
       Part I.   
        Introduction | Omens  
        Part II.  The DES Paradigm: Crossing the 
        tolerance threshold  
        Part III.  Here, There, Everywhere: Chasing 
        the plastic impostors  
        Part VI. Altered Destinies: Up against 
        evolution 
        Part V.  Carson Redux: Theo Colborn 
        creates her own legacy 
         
       Part 
        I: Introduction - Omens 
        In July 1991, a group of scientists-including Theo Colborn, then a fellow 
        at the W. Alton Jones Foundation, and John Peterson (Pete) Myers, the 
        foundation's director, gathered at the Wingspread conference center near 
        Racine, Wisconsin, to discuss their concerns about hormone-disrupting 
        chemicals in the environment. They were disturbed by mounting evidence 
        that synthetic compounds found in pesticides and industrial chemicals 
        were wreaking havoc with endocrine systems. 
       The scientists shared 
        information on a broad range of species with problems that ranged from 
        thyroid dysfunction, decreased fertility, and gross birth deformities 
        to feminization of males, masculinization of females, and compromised 
        immune systems. Many of the chemical compounds under discussion had an 
        affinity for estrogen receptors in particular and their effects on wildlife 
        paralleled those seen in humans exposed to the synthetic estrogen DES 
        (diethylstilbestrol). Although environmental hormone disrupters were known 
        mainly for their effects on wildlife, the scientists at the Wingspread 
        meeting concluded that the substances had the potential to cause large-scale 
        dysfunction in humans as well. 
       In Our Stolen Future, 
        a new book excerpted here, Theo Colborn and Pete Myers have joined forces 
        with environmental science writer Dianne Dumanoski to survey the problem. 
        They have found that hormone-disrupting chemicals are ubiquitous and that 
        the pathologies they cause may result even from extremely low levels of 
        exposure. Although many synthetic chemicals have been tested for carcinogenic 
        effects, few have been scrutinized for their impact on the human endocrine 
        system. As the authors of Our Stolen Future observe, if such substances 
        are causing wide-scale disruption of the hormones that enable us to grow 
        and reproduce, we may be witnessing an evolutionary tragedy in the making. 
        -Bruce Stutz, Editor in Chief, Natural History  
        
      OMENS 
       The late 1940s: 
        Gulf Coast, Florida 
        Charles Broley began his study of Florida's bald eagles in 1939 at the 
        suggestion of the National Audubon Society. In the early 1940s, Broley 
        followed 125 active nests along the peninsula's west coast from Tampa 
        to Fort Myers and banded some 150 young eaglets each year. In 1947 the 
        picture suddenly changed. The number of eaglets began dropping sharply 
        and in the succeeding years, Broley witnessed bizarre behavior in many 
        of the eagle pairs. At nesting sites he had visited for thirteen years, 
        two-thirds of the adult birds appeared indifferent to nesting, courtship, 
        and mating. As Broley continued his work through the mid-1950s, he became 
        convinced that 80 percent of Florida's bald eagles were sterile. 
       The late 1950s: 
        England 
        Although otters were no longer as plentiful as in earlier times, the traditional 
        sport of otter hunting continued relatively unchanged into the mid-twentieth 
        century. To the sounds of horns and baying hounds, hunters still pursued 
        their prey; by the end of the 1950s, however, they began to have trouble 
        finding otters to hunt. When conservationists finally took note of the 
        problem, some suspected the pesticide dieldrin, but later work pointed 
        to another synthetic chemical. 
       The mid-1960s: Lake 
        Michigan 
        The mink industry that had grown up around the Great Lakes because of 
        the ready supply of cheap fish had begun to falter because of the animals' 
        mystifying reproductive problems. Females weren't producing pups. Michigan 
        State University researchers eventually linked the reproductive failure 
        to PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls), a family of synthetic chemicals used 
        to insulate electrical equipment. Curiously, a decade earlier, other mink 
        herds in the Midwest had crashed after the animals were fed scraps from 
        chickens that had been given the growth-promoting drug DES. Although the 
        symptoms were strikingly similar to those of the Michigan incident, the 
        second crash of fish-fed mink could not be linked to DES. 
       The early 1970s: 
        Channel Islands, Southern California 
        Working on San Nicolas Island in 1968, Ralph Schreiber, of the Los Angeles 
        County Natural History Museum, spotted some gull nests with unusually 
        large numbers of eggs. Since gulls rarely incubate more than three eggs 
        at a time, Schreiber immediately suspected that more than one female was 
        laying in these nests. Four years later, George and Molly Hunt, of the 
        University of California at Irvine, noticed the same phenomenon on Santa 
        Barbara Island. They also saw thinning eggshells in the gull colony, leading 
        them to expect the birds were suffering from DDT exposure. Over the next 
        two decades, nesting female pairs would be found among the herring gulls 
        in the Great Lakes, glaucous gulls in Puget Sound, and roseate terns off 
        the coast of Massachusetts. Were the females sharing nests because of 
        a shortage of males? 
       The 1980s: Lake 
        Apopka, Florida 
        Surveys showed that in some Florida lakes, 90 percent of alligator eggs 
        hatched, but at Lake Apopka the hatching rate barely reached 18 percent. 
        Even worse, half of those that hatched died within ten days. Louis Guillette, 
        a University of Florida reptile biologist, felt there was little question 
        that the problems were linked to a 1980 chemical spill, after which more 
        than 90 percent of the alligators disappeared. But why, after the waters 
        were again clear, were researchers still finding hatching problems, and 
        why did at least 60 percent of the males have abnormally tiny penises? 
       1990s: Copenhagen, 
        Denmark 
        Over the years, Niels Skakkebaek, a reproductive researcher at the University 
        of Copenhagen, had seen more and more human sperm abnormalities, as well 
        as a drop in the typical sperm count. At the same time, Denmark's rate 
        of testicular cancer had tripled. Skakkebaek also noticed low sperm counts 
        and unusual cells in the testes of men who developed this type of cancer. 
        Were the findings connected? He and his colleagues eventually reviewed 
        sixty-one studies, most from the a United States and Europe, but also 
        from Asia, South America, and Africa. They were stunned to find that average 
        human male sperm counts had dropped by almost 50 percent between 1938 
        and 1990. 
       Next... 
         
        
      
      
        
      
       Colborn, T., D. 
        Dumanoski, J. P. Myers. 1996. Hormonal Sabotage. This article and the 
        ones linked to it was originally published in Natural History, March 1996, 
        105(3):42-49. Excerpted from the book Our Stolen Future. 
        
        |